Call to Action: Not Just About the Legislation

“The most important changes will not result from legislative action but require different actions and patterns of leadership by bishops, clergy and laity in their conferences.  These changes must be grounded deeply in the spiritual disciplines of prayer and fasting.”

                       For the Sake of a New World, We See a New Church
                                           Council of Bishops, November 1, 2011

For months, leaders supportive of the Call to Action have said “It’s not just about the legislation.”  But for two weeks at General Conference, it WAS about the legislation, primarily Plan UMC.
While Plan UMC was a substitute for the Connectional Table’s original legislation, it did maintain a strong governance board and executive general secretary to give oversight to the work of the general agencies. This was in keeping with the Call to Action recommendation to “consolidate program and administrative agencies, align their work and resources with the priorities of the Church and the decade-long commitment to build vital congregations.”

Plan UMC passed by a vote of 567 to 384, a 60% majority. There’s no question that Judicial Council Decision 1210 came as a disappointing blow, proclaiming Plan UMC unconstitutional. 

But another expressed desire of Call to Action supporters was to at least come away from General Conference with some movement toward the directions proposed by the Interim Operations Team.  So did we?

The Call to Action lifted up the need for recruitment and training of young clergy, and recommended a shift in our resources to support this action.  Result at General Conference: Delegates approved two new line items in the World Service Fund, establishing a new $5 million fund for theological education in central conferences and allocating $7 million to recruit and train young clergy in the United States.

Another goal of the Call to Action was to support legislation proposed by the Ministry Study Commission regarding guaranteed appointments.  This was passed, providing for the following actions:

  • Bishops and cabinets will be allowed to give elders less than full-time appointment.
  • With approval of their cabinets, boards of ordained ministry and annual conference’s executive session, bishops and their cabinets could put elders on unpaid transitional leave up to 24 months. Clergy on transitional leave would be able to participate in their conference health program through their own contributions. 
  • Each annual conference is asked to name a task force to develop a list of criteria to guide the cabinets and bishops as they make missional appointments. 
  • The cabinets shall report to the executive committees of boards of ordained ministry the number of clergy without full-time appointments and their age, gender and ethnicity.Cabinets will also report their learning as appointment making is conducted in this new manner.
Reform of the Council of Bishops was another recommendation highlighted in the Call to Action. While the COB’s own legislation to allow for a full-time president received 55% of the vote, but not the required two-thirds for the constitutional amendment, the Council of Bishops made an important decision in their meeting preceding General Conference. Retired bishops will now meet with the COB only once a year; active bishops will focus on the adaptive challenge at their spring meeting.

And what about the Adaptive Challenge “to redirect the flow of attention, energy and resources to an intense concentration on fostering and sustaining an increase in the number of vital congregations effective in making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world?”  Congregations across the world were invited to set goals for the 2013-16 quadrennium. Seventy-three percent of our congregations submitted goals, committing to engage 3.8 million disciples in mission, give $3.6 billion to mission, and double the number of vital congregations.

Tiny steps towards the Call to Action proposals?  Perhaps. But for me they stand as signs of hope that move us toward a new church, for the sake of a new world.
The 2012 General Conference proved more than ever that “important changes will not result from legislative actions.” Beyond the hopes many of us had for creating significant change in how we do business and order our lives together are many complex, systemic issues which have caused deep divisions.

May we enter into a season of prayer, discernment and healing as we seek God’s leading into a future with hope. And that hope is built on nothing less than our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Popular posts from this blog

Rev. Dr. Beverly Jones: Still a United Methodist after all these years

Dawn Wiggins Hare: Why UMC